The Market Authority Assessment

How Market Authority scores are produced, what sources are used, and why the result is independent.

What the assessment produces

The Market Authority Assessment evaluates a business across two dimensions — Human Authority and Structural Confidence — using publicly available, third-party verified data sources.

The result is a single composite score on a scale of 0 to 100. The scoring methodology, pillar structure, and formula weighting are published at Market Authority Standard.

Data sources

Each of the eight components draws from specific third-party sources. No data is self-reported or submitted by the business being assessed.

Human Authority

Human Authority is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, calculated across four equal-weight components.

Component Primary sources
Strategic Positioning Public website, brand messaging, product and service positioning language across all public-facing channels
Proof & Validation Trustpilot, Google Maps reviews, verified press coverage, industry awards databases, certification and accreditation bodies
Trust Infrastructure Schema.org structured data scan (JSON-LD), privacy policy, GDPR compliance signals, legal entity disclosure on website
Market Presence Search index presence, social media platforms (Instagram, LinkedIn), press citation volume, content breadth and depth

Structural Confidence

Structural Confidence is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, calculated across four equal-weight components. 

Component Primary sources
Filing Compliance National company registries: CRO (Ireland), Bolagsverket (Sweden), Companies House (UK), CVR (Denmark), and equivalent registries in other jurisdictions
Financial Risk Signals Filed annual accounts, solvency ratios, audited financial statements, credit reference agencies (D&B, Creditsafe, UC)
Governance Stability Registered director history, ownership records, officer appointment and resignation frequency
Operational Longevity Company registration date, continuous trading record, entity age

Independence

The assessment is conducted by Digital Scorecard. The business being assessed has no involvement in data collection or scoring.

  • All sources are publicly available and independently verifiable
  • No data is submitted, selected, or approved by the business
  • Every MAI Assessed report cites the specific sources used
  • The scoring methodology is published and fixed: The Market Authority Standard

Why a score cannot be bought

An MAI score reflects the state of publicly verifiable signals at the time of assessment. Commissioning an assessment does not influence the result — the score is determined entirely by what exists in public sources.

A business improves its score by improving the underlying signals: earning more independent reviews, publishing complete schema markup, maintaining filing compliance, building verifiable press coverage. Those improvements must be real and independently verifiable.

There is no mechanism by which a business can purchase a higher score.

MAI Certification

When a business is assessed and receives a score it is then allocated into one of 4 categories. 

Those that are scored at 64 and below are not Certified. The other 3 categories are shown. 

Certification MAI Score What it indicates
MAI Gold 80 and above A business that is leading in its sector.
MAI Silver 70 – 79 A business with significant authority in its market.
MAI Certified 65 – 69 A mark of credibility in its sector.

The Assessment

The Market Authority Assessment is applied in three variants, each differing in the depth and source coverage used.

The scoring formula and component structure are identical across all three methods. MAI Assessed provides the highest source depth and the most precise result.

Level Method Output
MAI Expected Public signal estimate using four sources: Trustpilot data, company registry age, employee scale, press mention volume Score range + confidence level
MAI Estimated Desk-based review using additional public signals: website, social media, basic registry check. Used primarily for sector benchmarking and competitor mapping Single estimated score
MAI Assessed Full assessment by Digital Scorecard analysts across all eight components, with primary source research, financial data review, and complete source citation Full MAI score (HA + SC) with sourced report

Assessments are conducted in accordance with: Nugent, E. (2025). The Market Authority Standard, Version 1.1. Digital Scorecard. digitalscorecard.com/market-authority-standard/